beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.11.23 2016고단5253

재물손괴등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

From about ten years ago, the Defendant is between the victim B and the deceased on February 2016, and the victim C is the father of the victim B.

1. On March 7, 2016, at around 20:00, the Defendant destroyed plastic covers, etc. so that the repair cost amounting to approximately KRW 1.30,000,00 of the entrance door number of the front door of the victim No. 204, the Defendant: (a) carried the victim out the front door of the victim No. 204; (b) however, the victim, in his/her hand, failed to inform the password of the lock number of the entrance door number; and (c) the Defendant destroyed the victim’s plastic cover.

2. Around March 10, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. was the mobile phone of the victim C with the Defendant’s mobile phone (C) around 12:26, 2016.

Therefore, because of the refusal to grant strict pain to the test, some of them have done a serious behavior.

By May 23, 2016, the language and image that arouses fears to victims over 22 occasions, such as the statement in the list of crimes in attached Form 2, which is the same as being bound by the next Adore Sadon only, and left China, and the transmission of text messages, “sort and sort-sort-sorts,” was sent repeatedly to the victims.

3. The Defendant, on May 23, 2016, by mail around 12:20, Seo-gu, Gwangju, Seo-gu, 101 Dong-dong 806, would have the victim B’s face photographed in another woman’s b body photo, 7 head of the printed photo of another woman’s b body photo and “to withdraw the opening grix test complaint.”

how to obtain us from the person who is not his or her father or his or her mother.

Therefore, it is a number of persons.

It is known that it has come to China.

(d) sea;

When the withdrawal was known, the victims threatened the victims by sending letters containing the membane, stating that he/she would have a marnar’s son and her mother in the apartment, so that he/she would be able to live.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;