A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

1. Defendant A

A. On July 29, 2015, around 08:30 on July 29, 2015, the Defendant suffered from property damage by drinking within the scope of “E” 507 of the “E” of the victim D’s operation in the city of Chungcheongnam-do, Jeollabuk-do.

As the body of each other fighting fighting, the body of the water purifiers kept at the same place, which was tightly cut off, and the water purifiers, such as Drackers, were laid in a glass window and broken down.

As a result, the Defendant damaged the victim-owned market price of 250,000 won, 1 glass 60,000 won in the market price, 40,000 won in the market price, and 1 glass 40,000 won in the market price.

B. On July 29, 2015, at around 09:00, the Defendant: (a) discovered that there was a 112 report by the proprietor of the inn operation D at the place specified in paragraph (1); (b) G from the F District of the Si/Eup/Myeon Police Station affiliated with G; and (c) G from the security guards dispatched to the site; and (d) he found that B was exposed to the floor of the said B; and (b) found that B was exposed to the front floor of the said B in order to clean the front floor of the said B, with the first responder called to the said police officer, she laid off B into the room room, she was spited with the said police officer’s face, she was able to take a h’s face; and (c) she spited the face once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

2. Defendant B tried to arrest Defendant B as a flagrant offender of the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties at the time and place specified in paragraph 1(b), the circumstances and circumstances belonging to the F District Unit of the Jung-Eup Police Station, and the circumstances and circumstances that Defendant B attempted to arrest Defendant B as a flagrant offender of the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties. Defendant B shacked the body of G in the following circumstances: “Ig, fluoral fluor, fluoral fluor, fluoral fluor, fluoral fluor, and fluoral fluor, fluoral f

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of D, G, and I.