However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 16, 2018, at around 23:45, the Defendant: (a) received a report of noise problems between floors in the apartment building B in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu; and (b) received a request from the police officer D and the security guards E belonging to the Seoul Northern Police Station C District Police Station in Gwangju-gu to file a petition; (c) the Defendant was able to put a hand on his/her hand; and (d) assaulted by the method of checking and smuggling on one occasion, thereby interfering with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the reporting duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act - Reasons for sentencing in favor of the defendant under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence - Normals: The fact that the defendant has recognized his/her mistake, only the fact that the defendant has received a suspended sentence once, - Unfavorable circumstances: A police officer who assaults a police officer who attempts to file a petition of a defendant who intends