2.

A. The contents asserted by the Plaintiffs against the Defendants and the contents asserted by Defendant D against the Plaintiffs in the first instance court, and in light of the evidence submitted by the first instance court, the fact-finding and judgment by the first instance court seems legitimate.

B. Therefore, the reasoning for the statement in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the parts added or added in the following two paragraphs, and thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The 5th side of the first instance court’s 4th side and the 5th side of the said part added and dried shall be considered as the 5th side and rear side.

In the first instance judgment, the evidence No. 15 of the first instance judgment is regarded as “Evidence”.

In the judgment of the first instance, the first instance court’s number of pages 7, 11, or 2, shall be added.

Part 10 of the judgment of the first instance, the inventory amount of the 14th judgment is higher than that of the inventory amount.

No. 11 of the judgment of the first instance was conducted from around 11, and later, the Plaintiff Company added “from G.”

After the first instance judgment Nos. 11, 4, and 7, “G” was added to “the time limit.”

No. 12 of the judgment of the first instance court, No. 9 "the insured" is regarded as "the insured".

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and all appeals against the Defendants and appeals against the Plaintiffs by Defendant D are dismissed.