However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

피고인은 2013. 4. 19. 06:30경 안동시 C에 있는 피해자 D(여, 53세)의 집에서 피고인과 함께 시간을 보내주는 대가로 피해자에게 건넸던 50만 원을 돌려달라고 하였다가 거절당하자, 집에서 들고 온 식칼(총 길이 35cm, 칼날 길이 24cm)을 든 채 피해자에게 욕설을 하며 "돈 돌려

(i) the destruction of bamboo;

In order to get back KRW 500,000 from the food victim who frightened "the frighten female who was next to the frighten female, but was attempted to get back the frighten female of the defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the records of seizure, list of seizure and report on investigation (absent after photographing the offender);

1. Articles 6, 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, Article 350 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (i.e., confessions and reflects, the fact that the victim and the victim agree smoothly, the fact that the criminal conduct is committed toward attempted crimes, and the fact that the criminal conduct was not committed for the same kind of crime, etc.);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;