When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 19:15 on October 6, 2014, the Defendant: (a) sought a complaint about the matter of notification as a drinking disturbance within the Suwon-si 116-ro 116-gil, Suwon-si, which had been subject to notification as a drinking box before the police box; and (b) sought a disturbance in the state of drinking within the government office for about 15 minutes, including: (c) why the field of the breabbbbbbing, spons, and was sponsed; and (d) why the breabing area was why the breabbing area was sponsed; and (e) continuously directed the police officer who tried to take a bath and stop it over several times, but continued to have sprinked and sponsed, and avoided the disturbance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the statement of de facto exploitation;

1. Relevant provisions of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and Selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;