A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments as to Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4 as well as Eul evidence Nos. 1 and Eul evidence Nos. 1, Defendant B’s front of the "E" restaurant located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around December 31, 2014, Defendant C, who was the mother of Defendant B, wanted to know the fact that he lost his money on the same day, and was unable to get a disturbance while confirming the above restaurant because he found the CCTV, he stated that "if he went to his house, he would be why he would do so or why he will leave the house," and the plaintiff was held liable for damages to the plaintiff, such as Defendant B’s injury caused to the plaintiff, including the above crime of 0-day pressure for treatment between 70 days and the plaintiff’s chest by hand (hereinafter “the instant assault”).

(b) Scope of passive damage (1) : Income from (i) 3,676,480 won (i.e., 1,74,70 won (1,931,710 won): The period of admission 87,805 won (22C) in the upper half of 2015: (i) 59 days in total; (ii) 28 days in the 20th day from December 31, 2014 to January 27, 2015; (iii) 31 days in the 20th day from March 2, 2015 to April 1, 2015; (iv) 30 days in the 20th day from March 31, 2015 to April 27, 2015; (v) x 100 days in the 20th day from December 31, 2014 to 30 days in the 27th day from January 28, 2015).