If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. The Defendant forged a private document with male-friendly appearance B, using the fact that the Defendant possessed his pro-Japanese resident registration certificate, thus gathering C’s name to open a mobile phone.

Around September 10, 2018, the Defendant, along with B, entered the details related to the subscription of the mobile phone, such as “C”, “C”, “C”, and “G” in the deposit number column in the name of the subscriber in the Franchising book without C’s consent or permission, and signed the C at will in the name of the subscriber in the name of “C”, “C”, “C”, “C” and “C”, and “C” in the deposit number column, and continuously signed the C’s name in the name of the subscriber in the name of “C”, “C”, “C”, “applicant/subscriber” column, and “H” in the deposit number column, and signed the C at will subsequent to the name.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B, forged two copies of a written application for subscription to a mobile phone in the name of C, which is a private document related to rights and duties.

2. The Defendant, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph (1), exercised each of the instant investigation documents to E as if the two copies of the forged application form for joining a mobile phone were a document duly formed.

3. The Defendant, along with B, took advantage of the name C in the same manner as at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), and opened two opphone X (the phone number G, H) from the victim E, who is a mobile phone agent, as if he/she had a legitimate right to open a mobile phone.

However, at the time, the Defendant and B did not have obtained consent or delegated authority to open a mobile phone from C, and there was no certain occupation or income.