상해등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentence of the court below (two years of suspended execution in August, and one hundred and sixty hours of probation and community service order) is too unreasonable in light of the summary of the grounds for appeal.
2. The court below's sentence is appropriate in full view of the defendant's age, career, character and conduct, environment, motive and method of each of the crimes of this case, motive and method of each of the crimes of this case, circumstance after the crime, etc., as well as all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the arguments and records, such as the defendant's age, career, character and conduct, environment, motive of each of the crimes of this case, motive and method of each of the crimes of this case, circumstances after the crime, etc., even though the defendant had been subject to criminal punishment several times due to the crime of larceny, the victim E and H were returned, and there was no criminal record exceeding the fine.
The defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.