beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.08.10 2017고단991

중과실치사등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has been residing in the Gabud C in the Gabud 306 of the Gabud 306.

피고인은 2016. 12. 9. 02:30 경 위 C 306호에서, 일을 마치고 귀가한 후 술에 취한 채로 담배를 피우다가 담배꽁초의 불을 빈 일회용 종이컵에 비벼서 뭉갠 후 위 종이컵을 그곳 주방과 현관 사이에 둔 쓰레기 종량제봉투 쪽으로 집어던지게 되었다.

At this point, as a studio of about 25 square meters at the entrance of the entrance of the entrance, many combustible materials, such as a empty stack box, an empty shot box, etc., have been accumulated at the entrance of the entrance of the entrance, and the standard plastic garbage bags are more than half, so there is a high possibility that the fire can be spread easily, and there is a lot of people living in the studio building, and in the plan, there was a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of fire in advance by dumping tobacco to the person who smokes tobacco at a safe place, such as the left away from the beginning of

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol without neglecting this, the Defendant, while smoking cigarette butts were not fluently cut down to the fluoral cup, did not cut down to the fluoral cup, and caused the fluoral cup to move the fluoral cup to a stop, etc. in the fluoral in the fluoral paper remaining at the tobacco butts. On the same day, around 02:36 on the same day, the fluor had the fluoral 306 and 3th floor of the above fluoral, and the 4th floor of the fluoral.

Ultimately, by the above gross negligence, the Defendant: (a) destroyed a part of the 3th floor and the 4th floor of the studio building managed by the victim D so that approximately KRW 51,593,630 of the repair cost; and (b) at the same time, the victim E (37 tax) residing in the above 402 building, inhales smoke and poisonous gases, and attempted to escape through the window, and led to the death of the victim by falling the 10m lower than the 10m lower of the 10m lower of the 1studio, thereby causing a diversification damage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made against F, G, H, I, J, K, and D;

1. On-site photographs;

1. A death certificate;