beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.05.14 2014고단1419

위계공무집행방해

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, each of the above two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive is against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A entered the Republic of Korea on June 27, 2001, and left the Republic of Korea on January 30, 2007. The Defendant, as if it was difficult to re-enter the Republic of Korea by normal means, had the intent to enter the Republic of Korea, pretended to be another person, and was issued by the competent authority in Indonesia on September 2008 using the personal information of D, and acquired the visa of the Republic of Korea using the above passport.

On January 26, 2010, the Defendant presented the above passport and the visa to the public official in charge of entry inspection at the Incheon International Airport Entry Inspection Station, and entered the Republic of Korea as if he was D.

In this way, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties by fraudulent means.

B. On February 1, 2010, the Defendant related to foreigner registration presented the above passport to the Incheon Immigration Office located in Seogu, Jung-gu, Incheon, and the public official in charge of foreigner registration, and made a foreigner registration under his name.

In this way, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties by fraudulent means.

2. Defendant B entered the Republic of Korea on April 14, 2003 and departed from the Republic of Korea on April 11, 2006. The Defendant, as if it was difficult to re-enter the Republic of Korea in a normal way, intended to enter the Republic of Korea by pretending to be another person, and acquired a counterfeited passport in the name of F around August 201 through C, bromoer with a prompt passport, and acquired a visa in the Republic of Korea using the above forged passport.

On August 21, 2011, the Defendant, at the Incheon International Airport Entry Inspection Center, presented the above forged passport and visa to the public official in charge of entry inspection, and entered the Republic of Korea as if he was F.

In this way, the defendant uses a false document about a forged fact certification, and at the same time, is a public official through a deceptive scheme.