대여금
1. The Defendant: KRW 13,00,000 to Plaintiff A; KRW 14,00,000 to Plaintiff B; and each of them, from February 6, 2016 to June 2017.
1. Where there is no dispute between the parties to the determination on the cause of the claim, or comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 5, 6, and 7, Plaintiff A loaned KRW 30 million to the Defendant on December 21, 2015 as the due date for payment on February 5, 2016; Plaintiff B lent KRW 20 million to the Defendant on December 21, 2015; Plaintiff A lent the loan to the Defendant on February 5, 2016; Plaintiff A received KRW 20 million from the Defendant on April 41, 2017; Plaintiff received each of the repayment from the Defendant on March 6, 2018; and Plaintiff B received KRW 60 million on April 4, 2017.
According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff A the remainder of KRW 13 million ( KRW 30 million - KRW 12 million - KRW 5 million) and to the plaintiff B the remainder of the loan amount of KRW 14 million ( KRW 20 million - 6 million) and damages for delay calculated at each rate of KRW 15 percent per annum as stipulated by the Civil Act from February 6, 2016 to June 12, 2017, the delivery date of a duplicate of the complaint of this case, which the plaintiffs seek after the repayment date, from February 6, 2016 to June 12, 2017, and from the next day to the date of complete payment.
2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition by admitting it.