A. The Defendant entered into a contract with ZEex C to produce and supply promotional video works (hereinafter “promotional video works of this case”) among ZEex Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “ZEex”).

B. On March 26, 2012, the Plaintiff agreed with the Defendant to request the production of the instant promotional video works, and to supply the instant promotional video works by May 8, 2012 after producing and completing the production cost of KRW 150 million between the Defendant and the Defendant (hereinafter “instant contract”).

C. Accordingly, the Plaintiff consulted with the Defendant on the schedule for the production of promotional video works, completed the prior work, such as scenario planning and Hunting, and completed shootings at the location of the Sstex factory, research institute, etc. from April 12, 2012 to April 17, 2012.

On April 18, 2012, the Defendant notified the Defendant of the rescission of the instant contract at the editing stage for the above film, and the Plaintiff suspended work under the instant contract.

E. The Defendant produced a promotional video of the ZEex by utilizing some of the images taken by the Plaintiff and used them in D, etc.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9, 11 (including each number), Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

가. 당사자의 주장 1) 원고의 주장 원고가 이 사건 계약에 기하여 홍보영상물을 제작하고 있었는데, 피고가 일방적으로 이 사건 계약을 해제하였으므로, 피고는 원고에게 원고가 지출한 비용 7,635,990원(= 경비 2,935,990원 작가료 3,5000,000원 촬영료 1,200,000원)과 원고가 일을 완성하였더라면 얻었을 이익 80,332,910원 합계 87,968,900원을 손해배상금으로 지급하여야 한다. 2) 피고의 주장 원고는 이 사건 계약 당시 약속한 수준에 미달하는 조연출, 촬영스텝 등을 고용하여...