However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[B] The Defendant is a person who has overall control over the overall duties of the Corporation as the head of the headquarters from March 2016 to December 2017, and C is the head of the management support team from January 2015 to January 2017. From January 2017, E is a person who is working as the head of the management support team from January 2017. E is a person who is working as the head of the management support team from April 2016 to April 2016, and F is a person who is working as the head of the management support team from September 2015 to January 2017.

【Criminal Facts】

1. According to the “Detailed Implementation Plan for 3rd Staff Employment Screening” established on the basis of the above plan, the interview evaluation is conducted by means of a black interview centered on the ability to perform the duties, and the interview evaluation is conducted by means of a black interview, and the interview committee members are assessed as a total of 100 points from 1 to 10 points for each item with respect to 10 points for 10 points according to each item’s interview marking table, and have to determine the final successful candidate in order of high-rise braille.

Nevertheless, on December 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the conference room located on the 10th floor of Pyeongtaek-si Building 10; (b) without preparing an interview marking sheet to recommend several visitors to pass by the old workplace rent H; (c) he/she also selected four persons including I as a final successful applicant in the method recommended by the above I as a successful applicant; and (d) ordered the above E to prepare an interview overall evaluation sheet and an interview marking sheet as if he/she passed the above I in order of high score in the evaluation result of the interview members; and (c) ordered E to prepare an interview overall evaluation sheet and an interview marking sheet in the “comprehensive evaluation sheet for prior interview” column of the interview members, the Defendant entered the average of 92 points (in the relevant field) in the field of affairs 6( marketing) in the field of affairs 6(E); and (d) J falsely drawn the average of 90 points (in the relevant field of technical field) in the field of civil engineering 5(E).