However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[2013 Highest 2655] On June 16, 2013, at around 02:05, the Defendant reported the victim F (or 23 years of age), the victim G (or 27 years of age) was expected to turn on the vehicle in his Ecodo parked in front of Ulsan-gu D on the street before Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., and subsequently, the victim was forced to turn on the vehicle in time, but the victim was forced to turn on the side of the victim F., while the victim was placed on the right blue blue, the victim was faced with the victim's vehicle parked on the off part of the victim F., the victim's blue blue blue blue blue, and continued to f.e., the f., the f., the f., which included two balone weeks of treatment, and the f.g., the f., the f., the f.

[2013rd group3208] The defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Ulsan District Court on November 26, 2007, and a fine of 3 million won for the same crime in the same court on August 19, 201, and was sentenced to a fine of 3 million won for the same crime on more than two occasions for the drinking driving.

1. Around 23:15 on August 10, 2013, the Defendant driven an Eco-do vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of 0.090% without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of approximately 2km from the back side of the bank north-dong, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, Seoul-dong, to the half-dong distance of the same Si/Gu-dong.

2. When the Defendant was discovered to the head of the police station belonging to the Ulsan Central Police Station of the Ulsan Central Police Station, which is under the influence of alcohol driving in the reflect-gu distance, the Defendant forged the above I’s signature for the purpose of exercising his/her signature by signing I in the column for the signature of the driver of the police station as a result of the control of drinking driving of a portable device (PDA), and exercised the police officer’s signature as if he/she were aware of the forgery.

(i) the evidence;