beta
(영문) 대구지방법원김천지원 2016.08.31 2012가단9603

채무부존재확인

Text

1. With respect to traffic accidents listed in the separate sheet, automobile insurance contract between the plaintiff and the defendant against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract with respect to the vehicle with C low-speed (hereinafter “Plaintiff-motor vehicle”).

B. At around 18:25 on May 21, 2007, B driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle to enter the national highway No. 28, which was located in the Yacheon-si, Yacheon-si, and was stopped as the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”), and the part of the lower part of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was parked as the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, was concealed. Accordingly, the Defendant suffered an injury, such as fachial stypitis, brain salvin, salvinum, salpinum, and dropty.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) C.

After the instant accident, the Defendant started the pain of the left head, back, and shoulder part of the shoulder, accompanied by the pain of each bridge. The Defendant was diagnosed on April 16, 2010 with the multiple sub-complosion test type II by the Seoul National University Hospital at Ansan-dong Hospital, Macheon-do University Hospital, Aju University Hospital, etc. on the ground that the symptoms of medication and the negotition surgery were not shown even after having been conducted in a medical corporation, and was diagnosed in the form of the multiple sub-comlosion test group II at the Seoul National University Hospital at Mancheon-si, 20

7. 20. At the Yangsan National University Hospital, the Kansan National University Hospital diagnosed in the Class II of the Complex Madic Madic Madic Madic Madic Madic Madic Madic Madic Madic Madic Madic Madica

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Evidence Nos. 2, 3, and 5, the result of the commission of physical appraisal to the director of the Symna University of the Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts, the Plaintiff, the insurer of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, is liable to compensate the Defendant for the damages incurred by the Defendant due to the instant accident.

(b)where damage occurs or has been expanded by competition between the limited harmful act of liability and the factors on the part of the victim, even if the factors on the part of the victim are irrelevant to the cause on the part of the victim, such as the risk of bodily injury or disease.