except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 4, 2020, the Defendant: (a) received a report from a police officer, a police officer belonging to the Samj Police Station D District Unit, who was sent to the Defendant and received a recommendation to return home from a police officer, who was a police officer belonging to the Samj Police Station D District Unit, and received a report of 112 on March 4, 2020, thereby obstructing police officers’ legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported 112 cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. The police officer's written statement E of the defendant's legal statement is service in the D District;

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to the major pages of the relevant photographs and the bar campaigns of police officers dispatched;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 (1) of the choice of punishment (the choice of imprisonment in consideration of the past record of

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The confession and reflect of a crime by the defendant, the degree of tangible power exercised by the defendant is relatively weak, and there is no record of the same crime);