1. On February 2, 2012, the Defendant against the victim C, the victim D, the victim E, and the victim F was aware of the Defendant’s status, i.e., the owner of the above land, who is the right holder of the said land, and the victim D, the victim E, and the victim F, who is the right holder of the said land, were in need of the construction of the road to sell G land at the original city, with the intention to receive money, such as the cost for the construction of the road.

On March 2012, 2012, the Defendant against the victim C stated, “The Victim C is a vice president, a female fluoral fluorial fluoral fluor. Therefore, the Defendant would make efforts with the J President and the fluoral fluor. Public officials will receive money. The Defendant would open a road leading to H, if a State is a fluoral fluoral fluor.”

However, the defendant did not think of using the money received from the victim as the cost of building a road, and even if he received the money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to obtain permission for changing the form and quality of nearby land due to the above H's access.

The Defendant received KRW 30 million from the victim to the post office account in the name of the Defendant around March 17, 2012.

B. Around June 2012, the Defendant against the victim D, the victim E, and the victim F stated that “When the route is lowered, the Defendant shall purchase K forest in front of H one million won” with the victim D, the victim E, and the victim F, who are the right holder of the said temple land located in G in the original city located in G.

However, the defendant did not think that he would use the money received from the victims for the above K forest purchase cost, so even if he received the money from the victims, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to open for entry.

The defendant is against the victims.