A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is the representative director of G farming association located in the FF located in the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and Defendant B is the person who actually operates the I Co., Ltd. (Representative Director) located in the Hamo-gun, the building company.

G Agricultural Cooperative was selected as a subsidized business of the "Support Project for Agricultural Product Distribution Processing Facilities in 2010" from the Donsan-gun in April 2010 and received military subsidies from the Donsan-gun in order to newly build a single unit of 165 square meters (50 square meters) and a single unit of 660 square meters (200 square meters) and a single unit of the co-sponse co-sponse co-sponse ship of size of 165 square meters (200 square meters).

The total construction cost for the new construction of a low temperature storage house and a new joint screening house for sublime is 4.5 million won, which is first 4.5 million won, and first, the subsidized business operator executed 225 million won of the self-payment, and upon completion of the construction, the Mosan-Gun Office provided subsidies by the method of paying subsidies of KRW 225 million in the name of the rest of the construction cost.

Nevertheless, the Defendants had mind that the subsidized business operator would be able to cover the cost of construction by lowering the burden of self-payment of the subsidized business operator, and that the subsidized business operator would bear only KRW 100 million out of KRW 225 million, and the total cost of the subsidized business was only KRW 325 million, not KRW 450 million, but also KRW 325 million, but the subsidized business operator would bear the full amount of KRW 225 million, and that the subsidized business operator would receive the military subsidy by submitting false documents to the public official in charge as if the construction cost of KRW 450 million was paid according to the project plan submitted by the Nt.S. military administration.

In April 2010, Defendant B and C agreed to return KRW 125 million among them if the directors of the farming cooperative transfer 225 million to B, while Defendant B and C agreed to return KRW 125 million to B in the office of the farming cooperative.

Accordingly, the directors of the above agricultural cooperatives, including the defendant A, shall be KRW 500,000 through KRW 20,000,000,000, respectively, from April 19, 2010 to November 8, 2010, respectively, to the Agricultural Cooperatives (L) of I Co., Ltd. (L).