On January 2019, the Defendant found that the victim C, who was parked in the middle of Michuhol-gu Incheon, did not locked, and opened a door of the vehicle and opened it into the door, and kept a four-way market price that was the victim’s ownership, which was located near the top of the tank.

In addition, the Defendant, from that time to February 9, 2019, stolen the victims’ property at least three times in total, as shown in the attached list of crimes, from that time by the aforementioned method.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement E, F, and C;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (finding on the surface of a criminal), CCTV image-cape, PC bank monitoring photograph, request for on-site appraisal, confirmation of identity of a thie case fingerprint, photograph of damaged vehicles, etc., and a report on investigation (Listening to a report on victim C telephone statement);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. Scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria;

(a) Each larceny (Article 1, 2, and 3 / [Determination of Punishment] / thief for general property / [Class 2] There is no general larceny [Article 2] / [the scope of recommendation and recommendation] / The basic area of larceny [the scope of recommendation and recommendation], six months to one year and six months;

(b) Scope of recommendations according to the standards for handling multiple crimes: Six to nine months of imprisonment (one-two years and nine months of the upper limit of the second crime).

2. The sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., including the Defendant’s confession of the crime of this case and the fact that the Defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of suspension of execution, shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the favorable circumstances such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family