특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (fines 6,00,000) is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: (a) the defendant has a depth of his crime from the investigation stage to the trial of the case; (b) the defendant's driver's vehicle appears to have been covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance and thus, the victims' damage is deemed to have been recovered in considerable part; (c) the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime; (d) the court below sentenced the defendant to reduce the amount of a fine by taking into account all the circumstances favorable to the defendant; and (e) there is no change of circumstances in the situation to additionally reduce the amount; and (e) the defendant's blood alcohol concentration and driving distance at the time of the crime of this case, and other conditions of sentencing such as
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.