2. No. 2 of the seized evidence (Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office, No. 3299).

Even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant is called as a psychotropic drug handler, a Mesophopon (hereinafter referred to as “philoopon,” as follows:

I handled the 2016 Highest 4277

1.(a)

At around 12:00 on February 2, 2015, the Defendant administered phiphones by inserting approximately 0.03g of philophones to C using a single-use injection device, and by continuously injecting approximately 0.05g of philophones into arms using a single-use injection device, at around 12:00, the Defendant administered phiphones.

B. The Defendant above A.

At around 13:00 on the same day, the same telephones were received by delivering approximately 0.07 gramphones to C free of charge at the above telephones.

2. Around 05:00 on January 10, 2016, the Defendant administered phiphones by infecting approximately 0.05g of phiphones into arms from the Defendant’s dwelling toilets of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, 401, and 0.05g of phiphones using a disposable injection device.

"2016 Highest 4315"

1. At around 22:00 on June 23, 2016, the Defendant administered phiphones by injecting approximately 0.05g of phiphones into arms from the toilet of the first floor of the building near Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, and by using a disposable injection device.

2. At around 11:40 on June 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) contained Gamoto201 in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul; (b) approximately 0.37 gramopon and 8.72 gramopon in two vinyls; and (c) carried phiopon in one hand.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 4277"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each interrogation protocol of the prosecution and police officers concerning H;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C and I;

1. Each narcotics appraisal report "2016 Highest 4315";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each investigation report (the No. 19,32 of the evidence list) and accompanying documents;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of subparagraph 2 of seized evidence (Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office, No. 3299) to the existing Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;