If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in labor and is in a de facto marital relationship with the victim B (the victim).

The defendant had been able to find the D main points in Gangseo-si C operated by the victim in order to ask the victim's home according to the reason that the victim did not return home while she was the victim's hedging since one month, and did not return home.

From around 20:00 on March 5, 2012 to 00:29 on the 6th day of the same month, the Defendant sought the victim from D main points located in Gangnam-si C, and obstructed the victim’s work by exercising force over four hours, such as: (a) “I will die if I going to go to the Republic of Korea after having reported, I would go to do so; (b) I will die if I will go to do so; (c) I will go to do it; and (d) “I will go to do so if I will go to the Republic of Korea, I will do so; (d) I will go to do so; and (d) I would go to the son’s disease on the table.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (revision of facts of crime and attachment of table for handling 112 reported cases);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.