However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Defendant

A (the age of 48) and Defendant B (the age of 44) are between the two times in society.

1. At around 20:50 on March 21, 2019, Defendant A recommended 20 members of the group of friendship members and the victim B under the influence of drinking alcohol to return home at the “D cafeteria” restaurant located in Jinju-si, Jinju-si, Defendant A had two open measures for the victim to receive approximately seven days of treatment.

2. Defendant B: (a) at the time and place of Paragraph (1); (b) at the victim’s face; (c) the victim’s face was flicked; and (d) the victim’s face was flicked once and dangerous goods; and (d) the victim’s head was placed in an open room where approximately one week medical treatment is required.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the 112 reported case management table, on-site and photographs of damaged parts, and medical certificates;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation: Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution: Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines (revision according to the sentencing guidelines), the special injury, and injury by repeated crime (type 1) shall be reduced area, and six months to one year;

2. The risk of committing a crime by sculing the heads of one another due to a beer and beer of sentencing;

(b) recognize a criminal act as an contingent crime, and does not want to be punished to the other party by mutual consent;