손해배상(기)
1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
3. Text 1, 2, and 3 of the judgment of the first instance.
1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows, and the reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the part of the reasons for the plaintiffs in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification of each of the following items as follows. Thus, they are cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the
The plaintiff B of the 4th 3rd , "B", and each "Plaintiff C" of not more than 15 shall be deemed "B", and each "Plaintiff C" shall be deemed "Co-Plaintiff C of the first instance trial."
The portion of the “The Financial Evaluation of 2) Operational Capacity” was set as follows: 2) Pursuant to the Plaintiffs’ request, the monetary Evaluation of the capacity to operate: from January 1, 1970 to January 1, 1970, the victims of this case were 55 years old and 428 years old and 352, respectively, and the attached Form 4, “the daily profit calculation table for each victim of this case,” which is the daily daily income of rural communities, from the date when the victims of this case were determined to the date when the victims of this case were determined to the date when the victims of this case were determined to the date when the victims of this case were determined to the date when the victims were determined to the date when the victims of this case were determined to the date when the actual profit calculation table for each victim of this case was determined to the effect that the daily income calculation of the victim of this case was to be 10,142 won, rural daily income of 1987, and that the remaining amount of the victims of this case were to the victim of this case’s death.
In light of the following circumstances, it is unreasonable to claim compensation for damages related to the plaintiffs' lost income in light of the purport of the whole argument in light of the evidence mentioned above.
It is judged that it cannot be seen as going against the res judicata effect of the lawsuit claiming consolation money.
(1) A court.