A. Each point is indicated in the separate sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 among the 1st floor of the building listed in the separate sheet No. 1.

A. The Plaintiffs, E, F, and G are co-owners of H ground buildings in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (unregistered buildings; hereinafter “I building”).

Defendant C entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with the Plaintiff on March 1, 201 with respect to the portion of approximately 99 square meters inboard connected with each point of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 of the 1st floor among the I building (hereinafter “instant leased store”) by setting the deposit amount of KRW 9.1 million between the Plaintiff and A, monthly rent of KRW 1,600,00, and the lease period of KRW 12 months from March 1, 2011. Defendant D is a person who is operating a restaurant in the name of “J” jointly with Defendant C from the instant leased real estate, and is in the real position of a lessee.

The Defendants, in addition to the leased real estate in this case, possess and use approximately 13.5 square meters in the ship (hereinafter “the third floor possession portion of the instant building”) connected each point of 5, 6, 7, 8, and 5 attached Form No. 3 of I building, which is incidental to the instant lease agreement.

The leased store part of this case is owned by Plaintiff A, and the occupied part of the third floor of the building of this case is owned by Plaintiff B.

B. Although the instant lease agreement has been renewed several times, the Defendants failed to pay monthly rent of KRW 15,600,000 until May 30, 2015.

Plaintiff

On May 22, 2015, A notified that the instant lease contract was terminated due to the reason of the rent delay through content-certified mail.

C. The Defendants possessed and used the leased store and the third floor possession of the instant building until the closing of the argument in the instant case. On July 7, 2015, the prohibition of real estate possession was enforced.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-5, Gap evidence 2-7 and the purport of whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the instant lease agreement is concluded by the Defendants.