손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing the instant case, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for modification or deletion as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence
(The grounds alleged by the Plaintiff in the appeal do not differ depending on the contents alleged in the first instance court. However, even if considering the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff to this court, it does not differ from the fact-finding and judgment of the first instance court). 2. Change and deletion of the part of the first instance court No. 3, “Defendant C” in the third part of the third part of the third part of the first instance judgment to the same effect as “I are.........”
Defendant D is a person who has served as the representative director of the non-party company and was a shareholder of the non-party company. The defendant C is changed to "Co-Defendant C of the first instance court" in the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance.
Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance, "C" shall be deleted from each of the "C" and "C".
Part V of the judgment of the first instance shall be deleted from both "each" and "(the defendant C shall be subject to suspended execution for three years)."
Part 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendants in Part 7 shall be changed to "the above defendant", and the "C" shall be deleted in the item of the attached list.
Part V of the judgment of the court of first instance, "Defendant C was changed to three years of suspended execution to two years and six months of imprisonment, and Defendant D was changed to one year and six months of imprisonment, respectively, and Defendant D was changed to one year and six months of imprisonment," respectively.
Part 8 of the judgment of the first instance is changed to "The 21 March 2013" in Part 13 as "the time when the defendant corporation published an audit report in the year 2012 shall be March 21, 2013, and the time when the audit report was published in the year 2012 shall be April 2, 2013."
Part 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be changed to "time of submission" in Part 14 to "time of submission or disclosure."
No. 8 of the first instance judgment No. 17 shall be called “no.”.
The plaintiff is a defendant corporation through the non-party company in 2012 before the submission or public announcement of the above audit report.