When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who operates a mutual general restaurant of “C” in Daegu Northern-gu B.

No person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking shall place a false indication of the place of origin or place a mark likely to cause confusion therewith.

Nevertheless, from June 2014 to June 2014, the Defendant purchased approximately 480 km from “E” and “G” located in “G” located in the Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, in 38,500 g of rice (20 km) and used approximately 960 g of rice in the domestic place of business, mixed with approximately 480 km and approximately 1:1 g of rice in 10 g of rice in 10 g of Korea. However, the Defendant sold rice to “domestic products: rice products”; on TV side, the Defendant used a mark that may cause confusion with the origin of rice: rice products; and on TV side, sold 940 g of rice products, such as baled, baled, baled, baled, etc.; and stored for the same purpose as the sale of the remaining rice products of the United States.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to one of the photographic photographs, investigation reports (an extractment of indications likely to cause confusion as to the place of origin), a copy of the business registration certificate, a copy of the business report, and a receipt for purchase of rice from US

1. Articles 15 and 6 (2) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act include: (a) the confession of the facts of the crime by the defendant; (b) the reflection of his mistake; (c) the scale of the business is small and the failure to correct the indication of the previous business owner; (d) there are circumstances to be considered in the circumstances of the crime; (b) the defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment; (c) family relationship; (d) the motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the various reasons for sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, including the circumstances after

(not subject to the sentencing criteria)