except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 16:05 on September 8, 2013, the Defendant: (a) 16:05, the Defendant: (b) was aware of the Victim D’s Sheet while driving on the street in front of the “C cafeteria” located in the Sinpo City B; (c) the Defendant: (d) was aware of the Victim D’s Sheet while driving the vehicle in front of the vehicle in which the wife of the Victim D (the age of 32) was fluored; and (d) took a look at the Victim D; (c) took the breath of the said vehicle; and (d) took the flath of the Victim D’s her hair, she was aware of the flap; (d) she was aware of the flap’s flap; and (e) she was able to take the flap of the Victim’s son’s flap; and (e) 2) took the flap of the Victim’s f’s me;

2. The Defendant causing property damage, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in the preceding paragraph, destroyed the 1,162,514 cost of repairing the front wheeler in front of the driver’s seat by walking the front wheeler and the front wheeler in hand and walking the front wheeler of the driver’s seat in the victim G MM3 vehicle owned by the victim, a spouse of F, who was parked in F with only the wife and her children, with a view to avoiding the trial cost, at least 1,162,514.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol on F or D;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 257 (1), Article 366, and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Imprisonment with prison labor for choice of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the violation of criminal conduct and the absence of previous convictions other than fines for the last ten years);