However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant is a homeland reserve force member.

1. Around March 8, 2015, the Defendant received a notice of call-up in the name of the third unit commander of the 3879 unit unit in the army training site in the Ya-dong, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and the said training was not conducted without good cause even though the Defendant received a notice of call-up in the name of the third unit commander of the 3879 unit commander in the 3rd unit commander of the 3879 unit unit in the 302 unit commander in the Ya-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and from March 17 to March 20, 20

2. On March 8, 2015, the Defendant received a notice of call-up of homeland reserve forces in the name of the third unit commander of the Army 3879 unit in the name of the third unit commander of the Army, which caused “the second unit training” conducted at the above Defendant’s office on March 25, 2015, and on March 25, 2015, and did not undergo the said training without justifiable grounds.

3. On March 12, 2015, the Defendant received a notice of call-up of the homeland reserve forces in the name of the third unit commander of the Army 3879 unit in the name of the third unit commander, which caused “the second unit training” conducted at the above Defendant’s office and on March 23, 2015 at the training site of the said party reserve forces, and did not undergo the said training without justifiable grounds.

4. On March 12, 2015, the Defendant received a notice of call-up of homeland reserve forces in the name of the third unit commander of the Army 3879 unit in the name of the third unit commander of the Army, which caused “the second unit training” conducted at the above Defendant’s office on March 27, 2015, and on March 27, 2015, and did not undergo the said training without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each notice receipt and certificate for delivery;

1. Relevant provisions of the Acts and the choice of punishment for the crimes, and Articles 15 (9) 1 and 6 (1) of the Establishment of Homeland Reserve Forces Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant has been punished several times for the same crime.