1. On May 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 03:00 on May 7, 2018, at the C convenience store located in Seocheon-si B, there is no money to the victim D (25:3) who is an employee of convenience store; (b) on the ground that the victim refused to do so, the Defendant appears to have expressed his attitude that he would be able to enter the seat of the victim, drive the seat of the seat of the seat, drive the victim into the seat of the seat of the seat of the seat of the victim, her body toward the victim, and her body in the future and take a drinking, and (c) 20 minutes of the disturbance, she dumped the victim so that the victim could not perform the convenience store business, such as displaying goods.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's convenience store business by force.

2. On May 7, 2018, at around 03:45, at the same place as the above 112 report, the Defendant heard the Defendant’s statement in order to confirm the content of the report by the victim F (37 years of age) of the police station E District Police Station, Seocheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as “Seoul Special Metropolitan City”) and sent out, the Defendant made a public insult of the victim by speaking the victim as “Semania” and “Maki”, among those with the employees of the convenience store D and his name unsound.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Investigation reports and investigation reports (on-site CCTV analysis and investigation), and telephone communications with victims;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing field CCTV images;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. In the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes: The defendant continues to commit the same kind of crime even though he/she had the record of being sentenced to suspended sentence for the same crime, which is highly likely to repeat the crime.

The crime of this case seems to have been committed by the victim D with considerable fear.

There was no agreement with the victim F.

e.beliable;