A. In the case of Busan District Court 2012 Gohap 1021, the Defendant: (a) understood that “A prior knowledge was made; (b) D was aware of the fact that the shipment slips were forged; and (c) did not make a false statement contrary to memory because he made a statement according to his memory; and (d) found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case, which was erroneous in the misapprehension of facts and adversely affected the conclusion of the judgment.

The argument is asserted.

B. The Defendant asserts that the sentence imposed by the lower court (one million won a penalty) was too too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. The facts charged in the instant case (based on the facts) was tried at the Busan District Court on November 9, 2012 (the above court Decision 1072Da1072, August 30, 2013), and the Defendant was convicted of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (the above court Decision 1072, August 30, 2013) with regard to the Defendant’s breach of trust against D’s agent qualification for the aforementioned Defendant case under the E audit team, and the Defendant was convicted of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (the above Court Decision 2010Da16160, Oct. 16, 201) with the aforementioned judgment of conviction on the charge of forging’s breach of trust with the aforementioned H and J, and the Defendant was convicted of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (the above Decision 2010Da162160, Jun. 21, 2016).

[Criminal facts]