손해배상(기)
1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance other than to dismiss or delete part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420
【The part to be pronounced or deleted” Nos. 3-7-8 of the 3rd page 7-8 of the 3rd page 7-2 of the 7th page 5, the Defendant was indicted by the Seoul Southern District Court 2013Da3485, Jun. 30, 2014, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on November 28, 2014, and was prosecuted by the Seoul Eastern District Court 2014Da300, Aug. 22, 2014, and was convicted of a fine of KRW 300,000,000 on December 6, 2014.”
Part 3-9-10 acts are as follows: [Grounds for recognition] Gap's 21, 25, and 26 acts; "The facts in this court and the purport of the whole pleadings."
The second sentence of the 4th page "after the second sentence" shall be changed to "after the second sentence."
Part 4 3-4 "No. 3-4 "This decision that is deemed reasonable to dispute about the scope of performance obligation" is "the first instance court which deems it reasonable to dispute about the existence and scope of the performance obligation".
Part 4, the "Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings" in Part 5 shall be deemed as the "Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings", and the "money" shall be deemed as the "rest damages"
Part 5 7 "(Protocol of Examination of Witness F)" shall be deleted.
Part 5, “A” in Part 10, “A” and “A”.
Part 5, “B” to the Plaintiff “B” in Part 11.
Part 5, "Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7" in Part 15 shall be changed to "Nos. 1 through 4, 6 through 8 (including paper numbers)".
Part 5-6, 19-6, i.e., “The fact that the financial situation has deteriorated due to the failure of E to receive the construction price from D Co., Ltd.”
The first 6th 4th 5th 6th 6th 2012 is "facts, the defendant on November 2012."