If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 17:00 on July 24, 2012, the Defendant: (a) assaulted the victim’s breath with spath and spath on the ground that the victim F (74 years of age and South) was pushed out with a spathn in front of the E’s house gate located in Jindo-gun D, Jindo-gun.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. An interrogation protocol of the accused or F by the prosecution;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant asserts that, against the victim's assault, the victim was able to have a dular at the defense vehicle, but he did not have a dubbial and dubs of the victim.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence mentioned above, ① the victim consistently saw the bicycle on the part of the defendant from the investigative agency to this court, and the victim stated that the defendant was sprinking and sprinking the victim's sprinking. ② The witness G during the present situation stated that the defendant and the victim did not unilaterally commit an act of violence; ③ the victim's body photograph was found to have been sprinking and sprinking in the process of the victim's bodily injury, and ④ at the time of the investigation in the prosecutor's office, the victim's statement that "in the process of fighting with the victim's sprinking and sprinking the sprinking with each other, the victim's sphering and sphering the sphering." In full view of the following facts, the victim's statement that the victim's sphering and sphering the sphering the sphering.