성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined.
Examining the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted by the court of first instance, the court below was just in maintaining the judgment of the court of first instance which rendered a monetary collection of KRW 19,440,000 to the defendant, and there was no violation of law by misunderstanding the legal principles as to collection as otherwise alleged in the grounds of appeal.
In addition, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the sentencing of
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.