상해등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The Defendant in the grounds of appeal did not err by mistake of facts in the judgment of the court below which judged otherwise, even though there was no fact that the Defendant was trying to avoid assault by the victim E, and did not inflict an injury by citing the back, and there was no injury by damaging a wind-standing signboard owned by the victim G or causing an injury to the said victim.
2. Determination
A. According to the statements of the witness H in the part of the injury inflicted upon the victim E, the Defendant:
C. From 01:30 on the day following the dispute with G, etc. for the same reason, G around 01:0 on the following day, it is recognized that the victim of G et al. al. had a disturbance for 40 minutes due to the following: (a) around 01:30 on the following day following the dispute with G et al., the victim called the defendant's restaurant and changed the words; (b) the defendant was able to fight each other, and the victim was able to see that the defendant was not the victim's body; and (c) the CCTV photographs bound on the 43-45 pages of evidence records were bound in reverse order. According to the actual time order, the victim's statement, the victim E age, the defendant's body body body, and CCTV images, etc. were considered to have been produced by the victim's body, and the victim was found guilty due to the victim's fighting, and the victim's body was found guilty.
B. According to the witness J and the victim’s statement on the damage of property owned by the victim G, the defendant was dissatisfied with the issue of the victim’s visible sign due to the storm signboards set up on the access road that the defendant came to his own seat, and the defendant was at the time of the instant case.