2. The court below's punishment seems to be within the reasonable scope of discretion, and there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared to the court below's judgment, and thus, it cannot be deemed unfair since the sentencing of the court below is too unfair because the sentencing of the court below is too large, in consideration of the fact that the defendant resells the status of being selected as an occupant by receiving premium up to 60 million won within the period of restriction on resale. The crime related to resale of the right to sell real estate is not good in terms of inducing real estate speculation, inducing an increase in the housing price, and impairing the transaction order of real estate.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.