However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle B and C.

On December 23, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 06:30 on December 23, 2017, and proceeded with the two-lane road in front of the D church in C in the original city at the time of the original city at the door-to-door air protection area from the door-to-door air protection area.

At this point, there was a pedestrian crossing without signal signal at the front door, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to check whether there is a person who gets on the road by reducing the speed and by checking well the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and did not avoid the victim E (W, 48 tax) who walked the above crosswalk on the right side from the bend left side of the bend, and had the victim go beyond the floor by taking the part front of the right side of the defendant's vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the closure and diversification of 2-11 times of cage cages that require approximately eight weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. On-site photographs, on-site surveys, and on-site surveys, each investigation report, and each medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about criminal history;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (the crime of this case is committed in light of the method and result thereof, and there are circumstances unfavorable to the defendant. However, the defendant did not have any criminal records of the same kind and of the suspended execution, and the defendant did not have criminal records of the same criminal records and of the suspended execution, and it appears that the vehicle driven at the time of the traffic accident of this case would have been covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance and would have been compensated for considerable damage to the victim. In addition, the defendant was able to repent his mistake in depth, and is detained by the defendant.