The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged (excluding the part not guilty of the grounds for appeal) on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the intent, intent of unlawful acquisition, scope of disbursement of school expenses, political party act and perception of illegality in the crime of occupational embezzlement.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.