However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A (hereinafter referred to as “A”) from the victim H (34 Does and Mon A) to the G main store located in Cheongwon-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul on September 27, 2015, 03:00, in order to determine why this force has been caused by the victim H (34 Does and Mon A nationality).

”라고 말한 것에 대하여 앙심을 품고, G 주점 옥상에서 양손으로 피해자의 멱살을 잡아 바닥에 넘어뜨린 후에 발로 넘어져 있던 피해자의 얼굴 부위를 수회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the defendant got a part of the number of days of treatment to be treated by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness H in part;

1. Statement made by each police officer with respect to H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the parts of the victim's body;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on Suspension of Execution: The degree of injury to a victim is not weak, and circumstances favorable to the defendant that the defendant does not take measures to recover from damage: The crime committed contingently, and the portion not guilty that the defendant has no record of having been punished;

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: at the time and place indicated in the facts charged as indicated in the judgment; Defendant A her b b b with bomb, and Defendant B (hereinafter “B”) her b b flicked the back of the victim and her b flicked the victim on the floor; and the Defendants continued to walk the victim’s face flicked by walking the victim’s face.

As a result, the Defendants jointly put the victim in mind with the number of days of treatment, which is inside the body of the victim.

2. The Defendants merely told Defendant A and the victim’s fighting and did not participate in the violence, from the investigative agency to the court.

The argument is asserted.

The victim's statements are made in investigative agencies and courts as evidence corresponding to this part of the facts charged.

However, the defendant B is together with the defendant A.