2. Although the defendant led to the confession of each of the crimes of this case and reflects his mistake, the defendant again committed the crime of this case despite the fact that he had been punished several times for the same criminal records, and did not recover from damage, the crime of this case is not likely to commit the crime of this case. The crime of this case was committed in 29 times by the defendant intrudes into the telecom, etc., thereby causing considerable damage to the victim, such as pipe, outdoor machine price, repair cost, etc. by cutting the pipe, etc., the victim caused considerable damage by cutting the pipe, outdoor machine price, repair cost, etc., the scope of recommending punishment according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court (general habitual and repeated crime: 2-4 years of imprisonment) and other factors such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, criminal record, health condition, motive, circumstances, means, means and result of the crime of this case, etc.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.