2. The judgment of the court below shows the attitude of the defendant when committing the crime in substitution with the investigative agency, the court below and the court of the trial, and the fact that the defendant seems to require mental stability, etc. However, the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he had been punished for a period of one-year suspension of execution for the same kind of crime in April 2010. The judgment of the court below seems to have taken into account all the above favorable circumstances, and considering all the circumstances shown in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, character, character and environment, occupation, power, process, means and result of the crime of this case, circumstance before and after the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.