However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On August 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 06:50, at the “D” restaurant located in Silung City, on the ground that he did not know himself; (b) on the ground that he did not know himself, the victim E (29 tax) who was a towing place of work, who was a dangerous object on the table table; and (c) laid off three times the head part of the victim’s head, which led the victim to a two-way open situation where the number of days of treatment cannot be known to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to G and E;

1. Each statement of G, H and F;

1. Application of statutes, such as photographs of damage;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of the Criminal Procedure is deemed to have been committed in light of the following: (a) the crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: (b) the victim’s head was 3 times due to the main illness and inflicted an injury on the victim; and (c)

However, the above punishment shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing factors of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, relationship with the victim, method and result of the crime, and the circumstance after the crime, etc.