1,00,000 won shall be collected from each of the Defendants.

The Defendants, who are foreigners of the nationality of Thailand, dealt with the psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related clickphones (one clickphone; hereinafter “clickphones”), as follows, even though they are not authorized to handle them:

1. On May 16, 2019, Defendant A administered a phiphone in a way that a non-indicted farmer, located in the south of the Gyeong-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Gyeong-gun, in a vinyl house, put approximately 0.1g of philophone into a glass pipe, and heating the philophone into a single-use throwter.

2. On May 16, 2019, Defendant B administered philophones by inserting approximately 0.1g of philophones into drinking water and dilution in a vinyl house by a foreign farmer, who is located in the south of the Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Gyeong-gun, the Defendant administered philophones in a scopic method.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each appraisal report;

1. Seizure records;

1. A report on investigation (calculated additional charges);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. The Defendants of the relevant legal provision and the choice of punishment for the crime: Articles 60 (1) 2, 4 (1) 1, and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) (the point of administering phiphones and the choice of imprisonment) of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. The Defendants additionally collect: (a) considering that the sentencing grounds under the proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act (amended by Act No. 67) imposed a heavy penalty in light of the substance of the instant crime; and (b) taking into account the factors favorable to the Defendants, such as the confession of the commission of the crime and the absence of the record of criminal punishment, a sentence identical