Intimidation Defendant B, from around 22:00 on September 12, 2014 to around 23:00 on the same day, her phone from the cell phone of the victim G (ma, 32 years old) in front of the Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, with the phone of the victim G (ma, 32 years old) and her phone, not the end of the width to her end, but the death from the width to the width.

(2) Around 09:00 on September 6, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the victim at least three times in total, including the following: (a) during the dialogue with the victim G in the instruction center of the National Convergence Research Institute in Daejeon Pungdong-dong on September 6, 2014: (b) during the dialogue with the victim G, the Defendant: (c) i.e., “I have complied with the future tasks; (d) I have expressed the desire to see that I would have been able to write down on one hand.”

2. All the facts charged against Defendant B are those falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act. All the facts charged against Defendant A are those falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. The victim G is a crime not prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. The victim G can be acknowledged to have expressed its intent not to prosecute the Defendants by submitting a written agreement with the victim that only the Defendant B, A, and the Plaintiff withdraw the complaint after the institution of the instant indictment. Accordingly, each indictment against the Defendants is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.