However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 27, 2016, from around 22:15 to 22:40, the Defendant sent the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, to a hospital, within the 119 first-aid vehicle B that moves from the vicinity of the Daejeon Seo-gu Seopo-dong, Seo-gu, Daejeon to the “Yeyang-dong Hospital” located in 158, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon.

C Fire stations, who belong to C Fire stations, expressed a bath, such as shot, shot, etc., d's arms, d's wall sides, d's face, and drinking to D's face, interfered with legitimate execution of duties of a fire officer in relation to rescue and relief of a fire officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act suspended execution: Taking into account all circumstances, such as the fact that the liability for the crime, such as commenting and assaulting a fire officer who performs legitimate duties, is against the law, the fact that there is no special criminal record except for the punishment twice due to drinking driving, the fact that the degree of assault is insignificant, the degree of assault is minor, and the defendant's age, sex, behavior, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.