A. The Plaintiff is a corporation established for the purpose of the wholesale and retail business of liquefied petroleum gas, and the Defendant is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling soil and bricks.

B. On January 25, 2006, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the supply of liquid petroleum (hereinafter “instant supply contract”) with the Defendant, and installed at the Plaintiff’s expense the facilities, including the facilities listed in Paragraph (1) of the Disposition for the Supply of Liquefied Petroleum (hereinafter “instant facilities”), and agreed that the Defendant may use them free of charge during the period in which the said supply contract exists (five-year agreement).

C. The instant supply contract was renewed on January 25, 2006 and terminated after January 24, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1 through 4, 9 (including tentative number), the purport of whole pleadings

2. According to the facts acknowledged prior to the judgment, the ownership of the instant facilities is owned by the Plaintiff, but under the control of the Defendant, barring any other special circumstance, the Defendant is obligated to allow the Plaintiff to enter the Defendant’s workplace and collect the said facilities.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's main claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, without examining the conjunctive claim.