beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.02.15 2015가단5111900

보험금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff concluded an insurance contract with the Defendant, an insurance company, with the following content.

(1) A securities number B ② Securities No. 20904, July 28, 2009. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 21428, Jul. 28, 2009; Presidential Decree No. 21423, Jul. 28, 2009; Presidential Decree No. 22148, Dec. 22, 2009; Presidential Decree No. 22148, Dec. 22, 2009; Presidential Decree No. 22135, Jul. 22, 2009; Presidential Decree No. 22147, Dec. 22, 2009; Presidential Decree No. 22130, Jul. 22, 2009; Presidential Decree No. 22130, Jul. 28, 2070>

나. 원고는 주소지 마당에 스티로폼 박스나 화분에 흙을 채워 상추, 고추, 쑥갓 등을 집에서 재배하여 채소를 자급자족하여 왔는데, 여름철에 진딧물과 같은 벌레를 잡아 주기 위해 수년 전에 구입해 둔 농약(살충제, 린네이트 등 2가지)을 물에 희석하여 사용하여 왔고, 사고 당일인 2014. 7. 23.에 벌레를 잡기 위해 콜라 페트병에 물을 담아 살충제(농약)를 섞어 분말이 녹도록 둔 상태였다.

C. On July 23, 2014, the Plaintiff dices dye (hereinafter “the instant accident”); D, the Plaintiff’s husband, a rescue unit of 119 rescue units; sent the Plaintiff to an emergency hospital, and then sent the Plaintiff to the F Hospital. The hospital received treatment for the addiction of a pesticide while receiving treatment for the patient at the hospital, the Plaintiff was under the operation to cut down the son and both sides of the disease on August 14, 2014, and was under the normal recovery of food and language function, but it was difficult to live without the aid of the guardian, such as walking and daily life, due to the aftermathing of the dye.

The insurance of this case.