A. On November 6, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a contract with the Defendant to supply KRW 240,000,000 for the total of KRW 64,80,000 for the total of KRW 240,000 for the total of KRW 1,480,000. The Plaintiff supplied KRW 240,00 to the Defendant on November 17, 2015 according to the above contract. 2) At the time when the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with the total of KRW 240,00,00 for the total of KRW 2,40,000,000 for the total of KRW 2,40,00 for the total of the total of the total of the uniforms supplied to the Plaintiff in 201

3) The Defendant paid each of the Plaintiff KRW 10 million to the price for the complete recovery failure, KRW 20 million on July 29, 2016, and KRW 5 million on September 7, 2016. [The evidence Nos. 1, 7-3, 8, 9, 10, 13-2, 2, and 3-3, 2, and 3-2, and 3-2, and 3-3, 2016, based on the recognition, the Defendant paid each of the following charges to the Plaintiff: (a) evidence Nos. 1, 7-3, 8, 9, 10, and 13-2, and 3-2, and 2, and 3-3; (b) the result

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant’s total of KRW 10 million paid to the Plaintiff on February 3, 2016 and KRW 24 million on July 29, 2016 (= KRW 10 million) (i.e., KRW 14 million), out of KRW 20 million paid to the Plaintiff on July 29, 2016, shall be preferentially appropriated for KRW 24 million for the total of KRW 5 million paid to the Plaintiff on September 29, 2016 (i.e., KRW 14 million) and KRW 5 million for the total of KRW 16 million paid to the Plaintiff on September 7, 2016 (i.e., KRW 20 million) and KRW 14 million for the total of KRW 5 million paid to the Plaintiff on July 29, 2016 (i.e., KRW 20 million, KRW 165 million).

2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. The Defendant’s assertion that the Plaintiff was supplied to the Defendant in the year 2015 was the so-called post-satison.

Nevertheless, the plaintiff was a failure with excellent growth power.

Accordingly, the plaintiff and the defendant shall pay 20 million won the amount of the previous round of 2015.