However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 18, 2013, at around 21:00, the Defendant driven B Radon with approximately KRW 1k-mn-mn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-k

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on detection of drivers and circumstantial statements of drivers;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) shall be taken into consideration that the victim of a traffic accident caused by drinking is not punished by the

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and community service order has been subject to punishment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act several times, and among them, there are criminal records of probation, the defendant was punished for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, even though he was sentenced to a fine due to a crime of drunk driving in 2002, the blood alcohol concentration at the time of the crime was very high, and the defendant was even under the influence of alcohol, and in particular, the defendant was under the influence of alcohol, and even under the influence of traffic accidents, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant.

In addition, in consideration of the circumstances leading to the defendant in this case, the defendant's age, family environment, etc., a punishment equivalent to the disposition shall be sentenced.